Search results for Construction

Weekly Housing Trends View — Data Week February 13, 2021

Our research team releases regular monthly housing trends reports. These reports break down inventory metrics like the number of active listings and the pace of the market. In light of the developing COVID-19 situation affecting the industry, we want to give readers more timely updates on weekly housing trends. 

Generally, you can look forward to a Weekly Housing Trends View near the end of each week along with weekly coverage of our Housing Market Recovery Index and a weekly video update from our economists. Here’s what the housing market looked like over the last week.

As we move closer to the heart of home buying season, we’re starting to see some relatively promising signs in trends among sellers. While there are still fewer newly listed homes compared to a year ago, the share of newly listed homes is rising meaning that buyers are seeing more fresh listings relative to longer-for-sale homes. Unfortunately, the total number of homes for sale continues to decline meaning fewer overall options for buyers, causing prices to rise, homes to sell quickly, and buyers to show some signs of frustration. While buyer demand growth remains high, it slowed in the last week as some buyers are likely reevaluating their options in light of these tough housing market conditions. 

Weekly Housing Trends Key Findings

Key Findings:

  • Median listing prices grew at 12.9 percent over last year, notching the 27th consecutive week of double-digit price growth, easily double the rate we would see in a more normal housing environment. With home shoppers active and sellers still lacking, this upward pressure on prices is likely to remain. Still low mortgage rates in 2021 have helped offset the pain of higher prices, but mortgage rates are expected to rise later in the year, thus affordability is likely to become a top-of-mind consideration for buyers.  Tools like the mortgage calculator can help buyers understand what price and mortgage rate changes mean for their monthly payment.
  • New listings–a measure of sellers putting homes up for sale–continue to fall behind the year ago pace, registering 23 percent lower this week. After the upswing in newly listed homes at the end of 2020, new listings have tread a different path in 2021, with large and consistent declines. Despite early weakness, we expect to see new listings grow in March and April as they traditionally do heading into spring, and last year’s extraordinarily low new listings comparison point will mean year over year gains. One other potential bright spot for would-be homebuyers, new construction, which has risen at a year over year pace of 20% or more for the last few months, will provide additional for-sale inventory relief.
  • Total active inventory continues to decline, dropping 48 percent. With buyers active in the market and seller participation lagging, homes are selling quickly and the total number actively available for sale at any point in time continues to drop lower. In January as a whole, the number of for sale homes dropped below 600,000.
  • Time on market was 11 days faster than last year meaning that quick decisions are still the norm. On the plus side for today’s buyers, this means that the share of fresh listings on the market is slightly greater than it was at this time last year. On the downside, today’s for-sale homes won’t be for sale long, so buyers will need to act fast when they find a home that fits.

Data Summary

First 2 Weeks March 2020Week ending Jan 30Week ending Feb 6Week ending Feb 13
Median Listing Prices+4.5% YOY+13.5% YOY+12.9% YOY+12.9% YOY
New Listings +5% YOY-21% YOY-29% YOY-23% YOY
Total Listings -16% YOY-45% YOY-47% YOY-48% YOY
Time on Market4 days faster YOY10 days faster YOY10 days faster YOY11 days faster YOY

You can download weekly housing market data from our data page.



Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates and notifications on the latest data and research.

Fourth Quarter 2020 Las Vegas Retail Market Report

Las Vegas Retail Market Report

Fourth Quarter 2020 

Inventory
Total retail inventory in the Las Vegas market area amounted to 116,879,711 square feet, up 691,407 square feet from one year ago. There is currently 892,224 square feet under construction.

Sale Activity

In the fourth quarter, 99 retail transactions closed with a total volume of $281,177,118. The 99 buildings totaled 1,009,637 square feet and the average price per square foot equated to $306.55 per square foot. That brings the total for the 2019 calendar year to 302 transactions totaling $656,465,854. The total square footage sold was 2,851,038 square feet for an average price per square foot of $262.10. The average Cap Rate was 5.9%

Tallying all retail building sales.

Mark of a Market.

One of the largest transactions (excluding the resort corridor and specialty properties) that has occurred within the Las Vegas market is the sale of Crossroads Commons at 8825-8975 W. Charleston Blvd, as part of a 2 property portfolio sale. This 157,152 square foot retail building sold for $46,601,546 or $296.54 per square foot. The property sold on 12/23/2020. The Buyer was SF Crossroads, LLC. The Seller was Panther Crossroads Commons LLC.

Weekly Housing Trends View — Data Week January 23, 2021

Our research team releases regular monthly housing trends reports. These reports break down inventory metrics like the number of active listings and the pace of the market. In light of the developing COVID-19 situation affecting the industry, we want to give readers more timely weekly updates. 

Generally, you can look forward to a Weekly Housing Trends View near the end of each week along with weekly coverage of our Housing Market Recovery Index and a weekly video update from our economists. Here’s what the housing market looked like over the last few weeks.

Home sales and prices continue to surge ahead in the new year. Buyers entering the housing market in 2021 will need to be prepared and decisive in order to be successful in an environment where homes are selling fast and prices are rising.  Fortunately, still low mortgage rates continue to help offset the sting of higher home prices, for now, making finding the right property amid scarce options and making an offer quickly, the top challenges.

Weekly Housing Trends Key Findings

Key Findings:

  • Median listing prices grew at 14.4 percent over last year, notching 24 consecutive weeks of double-digit price growth. With demand still high and supply still limited, this trajectory seems unlikely to change in the near term. In 2020, lower mortgage rates have blunted the otherwise dampening effect that higher prices could have on buyer demand. But as mortgage rates transition from falling to gradually rising, the math changes. If mortgage rates trend upward, as we expect, affordability is likely to become a bigger challenge in 2021.
  • New listings continue to fall behind the year ago pace–registering 21 percent lower this week. After the upswing in new listings at the end of 2020, momentum continues to be lacking in 2021. While the new listings trend is noisier than active inventory, the persistent declines observed in the new year signal that selling may not have been high on many home owners’ new year’s resolution lists. An uncertain environment doesn’t generally inspire consumers to make big decisions, and on top of the unknowns surrounding COVID-19 and its trajectory, government policies to support the economy and battle the health crisis continue to unfold as the new Congress and administration set to work.  Looking forward, the surge in new cases is abating, and we’ve seen declines in new listings shrink over the last 4 weeks.  We expect new housing supply to continue to improve, if unevenly, as we move through the year, and while new listings are struggling to grow, new construction will provide some relief.
  • Total active inventory continues to decline, dropping 43 percent. A greater decline in overall inventory than in new listings is consistent with rising home sales and fast-selling homes that do not remain for sale for long.  
  • Time on market was 9 days faster than last year meaning that buyers have to make quick decisions to succeed. Although buyers have more information than ever available in their home search journey, they’ll need to marshall that information into actionable insights so that they can act with haste when the home that’s right for them comes up for sale. 

Data Summary

First 2 Weeks March 2020Week ending
Jan 9
Week ending
Jan 16
Week ending
Jan 23
Median Listing Prices+4.5% YOY+15.4% YOY+15.0% YOY+14.4% YOY
New Listings +5% YOY-26% YOY-22% YOY-21% YOY
Total Listings -16% YOY-41% YOY-43% YOY-43% YOY
Time on Market4 days faster YOY10 days faster YOY9 days faster YOY9 days faster YOY

You can download weekly housing market data from our data page.



Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates and notifications on the latest data and research.

Top Housing Markets for 2021

Realtor.com’s top 10 housing markets for 2021 have substantial momentum from 2020 which they will carry into 2021. Still low mortgage rates throughout most of the year help these markets see price and sales growth on top of 2020’s high levels. Economic momentum from the thriving tech industry, coupled with healthier levels of supply, will position these markets for growth in 2021. This past year, we’ve all become more reliant on technology to work, learn, and maintain personal connections. The technology hubs that make this possible are thriving, as are their housing markets. Additionally, the relative stability of government jobs in the past year has driven home prices and sales in several state capitals to the top. Home buyers, particularly younger first-time buyers, looking in one of these markets should expect rising prices and heavy competition. Meanwhile, sellers will remain in a position of power, but will find themselves on the other side of the bargaining table when buying their next home.

Top 10 Housing Markets Positioned for Growth in 2021
Rank*Metro2021 Sales Growth % y/y2021 Price Growth % y/yCombined Growth
1Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif.17.2%7.4%24.6%
2San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.10.8%10.8%21.6%
3Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C.13.8%5.2%19.0%
4Boise City, Idaho9.8%9.1%18.9%
5Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash.8.9%9.7%18.6%
6Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz.11.4%7.0%18.4%
7Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa.14.4%3.8%18.2%
8Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif.12.5%5.5%18.0%
9Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo.12.5%5.4%17.9%
10Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif.12.4%5.5%17.9%
United States7.0%5.7%12.7%

Ranking is based on the combined yearly percentage growth in both home sales and prices expected in 2021 among the top 100 largest markets in the country per realtor.com’s metro level housing forecast. In cases of a tie, Sales Growth y/y was used as a tiebreaker.

Tech Titans 

A common driver of this year’s top markets is the prevalence of high paying tech jobs. Tech salaries in Sacramento, San Jose, Boise, Denver, and Seattle have driven home prices through the roof over the last several years and this trend is expected to continue in 2021. Additionally, areas such as Charlotte and Phoenix are quickly establishing themselves as rising tech hubs with a plethora of jobs in technology, as well as education, government and healthcare. In fact, the projected unemployment rate for 2021’s top markets is 7.9% compared to the national average of 8.2%. Tech-related jobs make up an average of 8.7% of the workforce in this year’s top markets list compared to 6.4% of the U.S. as a whole. 

Relative Affordability

The top markets in 2021 aren’t cheap. In fact, home prices in eight of the top 10 markets are more expensive than the average of the top 100 markets. But many are relatively affordable when compared to their nearby counterparts or offer significantly more square footage for a similar price. For example, buyers priced out of New York ($216 per sq.ft.) can find increased space and affordability in Harrisburg ($122 per sq.ft.), while buyers in Sacramento ($284 per sq.ft.) can get more bang for their buck than nearby San Francisco ($679 per sq.ft.). This is also true when comparing Oxnard ($413 per sq.ft.) and Riverside ($247 per sq.ft.) with Los Angeles ($556 per sq.ft.).  

Home to Younger Households 

On average, the top 10 markets have a larger share of younger households, aged 25 to 34, (14.1%) than the U.S. as a whole (13.5%). A market’s ability to lure millennials is a good indicator of the livability of the area including: job opportunities, dining, and entertainment. However, when it comes to millennials purchasing homes in the top 10, two trends are emerging. In half of this year’s top markets, including: Charlotte, Boise, Phoenix, Harrisburg and Riverside, millennials are already homeowners and expected to make the majority of the home purchases that drive home price growth and sales. In the other group of markets, such as San Jose, Seattle, and Denver, the high cost of living has made homeownership a difficult accomplishment, not only for millennials but for all generations. The high number of millennials in the market shows how popular these markets have become, but older, more financially established generations will be the ones purchasing the majority of the homes next year. 

State Capitals 

Half of the top markets are state capitals, including: Sacramento, Boise, Phoenix, Harrisburg and Denver. The strong government presence in these areas offers stability for their local economy and jobs markets. This is especially important after a year when a global pandemic has significantly disrupted local economies across the nation. On top of the government jobs, these areas also have strong job diversity in both the public and private sectors, including education, healthcare, technology, manufacturing and military, which is positioning them for solid growth in the future. The average GDP growth rate for the top markets is forecasted to be 5.34% in 2021, versus 4.85% for the top 100 metros. 

Key Stats for Top 10 Housing Markets in 2021 
Top 10 Markets (Avg)Largest 100 Markets (Avg)
Sales % Change YoY 2021 (projected)+13.1%+6.8%
Price % Change YoY 2021 (projected)+6.9%+4.7%
Median List Price 2020$586,200$371,500
Median List Price YoY 2019+7.6%+4.3%
Households YoY 2021 (projected)+0.98%+0.53%

2021 Top 10 Housing Markets 

1. Sacramento, CA

Median home price: $554,050
Home price change: +7.4 percent
Sales change: +17.2 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +24.6 percent

Sacramento takes first place on this year’s top markets list. Due to the increased freedom to work remotely, buyers from the San Francisco Bay Area are flocking to California’s state capital for the increased affordability, without having to completely uproot their lives in Northern California. The area draws a diverse crowd ranging from first time homebuyers to empty nesters looking to downsize. Many young families are also drawn to Sacramento for the area’s strong school system, including West Campus high school which has a 99% graduation rate and received a 10/10 on greatschools.org. When residents want a change of scenery, it’s a short trip to Lake Tahoe, wine country or San Francisco. 

2. San Jose, CA

Median home price: $1,199,050
Home price change: +10.8 percent
Sales change: +10.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +21.6 percent

Also located in Northern California, San Jose is the largest city in Silicon Valley. Apple, Google, Facebook, Linkedin and even realtor.com® are all within commuting distance of San Jose. Unsurprisingly, the area’s strong economy and top notch school system, including Lynbrook High School (10/10 greatschools.org), lure top tech talent from all over the country. Those looking for a change of scenery can easily drive to San Francisco or the nearby mountains. Without a ton of room for new construction, inventory in the area is tight, so serious buyers should expect to pay above asking price.  

3. Charlotte, NC

Median home price: $368,819
Home price change: +5.2 percent
Sales change: +13.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +19.0 percent

Rounding out the top three on this year’s top markets list is Charlotte. The area’s high quality of life, great weather, strong school system including Providence High (10/10 greatschools.org) and rich history draw a diverse mix of both young and old buyers. Millennials are beginning to transition from the downtown city center toward the suburbs as they raise families and take advantage of the increased affordability and extra space. With access to both the beach and mountains, Charlotte has something for everyone, including kayaking along the Catawba River and hiking the Carolina Thread Trail. Housing supply has been tight, but new construction is booming as builders try to meet current demand. Charlotte was No. 7 on 2018’s top markets list. 

4. Boise, ID

Median home price: $445,000
Home price change: +9.1 percent
Sales change: +9.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.9 percent

Idaho’s capital city is firmly establishing itself as a rising tech hub in the U.S. The area’s high quality of life and strong economy draw people from all over the country, with the biggest influx coming from Washington, Oregon and California. This trend has accelerated as the ability to work remotely has drawn many young workers looking for a slower pace of life, increased affordability, and access to the area’s many outdoor amenities. Boise offers residents a mild four season climate, a vibrant revitalized downtown with plenty of entertainment, as well as a plethora of restaurants and boutique shopping. Outdoor enthusiasts are drawn to the area’s adrenaline pumping outdoor activities such as white water rafting and four different ski resorts. New construction has been booming in Boise over the past few years as builders scramble to keep up with rising demand. Boise is no stranger to realtor.com®‘s Top Markets list, it was No. 1 in 2020 and No. 8 in 2019. 

5. Seattle, WA

Median home price: $629,050
Home price change: +9.7 percent
Sales change: +8.9 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.6 percent

Coming in fifth is Seattle, which is home to some of America’s largest and most well known companies including: Amazon, Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and Nordstrom. The area’s booming tech scene, high quality of life, and access to both the water and mountains draws a crowd from all over the country. New and growing families will find a strong school system, including Greenwood Elementary School which scored a perfect 10/10 on greatschools.org, as well as four other schools which received scores of 9/10. Driven by high home prices and the desire for more space, buyers are beginning to search for homes further from the downtown center. This is especially true for first time homebuyers. 

6. Phoenix, AZ

Median home price: $412,260
Home price change: +7.0 percent
Sales change: +11.4 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.4 percent

Arizona’s state capital has become a magnet for both younger buyers looking to take advantage of the affordable cost of living, as well as retirees who want to soak up the sun. Recently, the area has seen a large influx of people from pricey West Coast markets — San Francisco, Seattle and Portland. While builders have struggled to meet the rising demand for housing, Phoenix set a record for new home permits in March, April and May, so new inventory is on the way. Phoenix offers residents all the big city amenities of shopping, dining and entertainment, without the traffic of larger metropolitan cities. Additionally, those who want to get out and hit the golf course have over 400 courses to choose from. Phoenix is a business friendly city and has a diverse list of large employers in both the public and private sectors from education, government and healthcare to technology, manufacturing and military. Phoenix was No. 5 on 2019’s top markets list. 

7. Harrisburg, PA

Median home price: $262,000
Home price change: +3.8 percent
Sales change: +14.4 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.2 percent

The state capital of Pennsylvania has become a hot spot for buyers looking for the quiet suburban lifestyle, more space, and increased affordability. Harrisburg is centrally located near New York, Baltimore, Washington D.C., Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Millennials in particular have been drawn to the area as both first time homebuyers and move-up buyers looking for more space for their growing families. Harrisburg boasts a strong job market not only for government employees working at the state capital, but those in healthcare and shipping industries as well. One of the biggest draws to the area is the ability to go from downtown, to the suburbs, to more rural areas, in under 15 minutes.  

8. Oxnard, CA

Median home price: $824,000
Home price change: +5.5 percent
Sales change: +12.5 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.0 percent

Located north of Los Angeles on the Pacific Coast is Oxnard, Calif. The area is a mix of farmland and Pacific Coast beaches, such as Hollywood Beach — a second home market for wealthy Angelanos looking for a break from the hustle and bustle of city life. Farmers in the area grow strawberries and lima beans and the annual Strawberry Festival is a big draw for Southern California locals. Thanks to its affordability, the area has seen a boost in demand from buyers seeking relief from Los Angeles and Orange County home prices. Beach homes in the area are significantly more affordable than those in Malibu or Santa Monica, making this a popular alternative for buyers hoping to get more bang for their buck. 

9. Denver, CO

Median home price: $520,000
Home price change: +5.4 percent
Sales change: +12.5 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +17.9 percent

Colorado’s state capitol is located just outside of the Rocky Mountains. The area’s housing market has been red-hot for the last several years and builders have struggled to keep up with the high demand for housing. Though the city is rapidly expanding, it still holds much of its Old West charm, and its cost of living remains relatively affordable compared to other Western markets. Many of Denver’s residents are outdoor enthusiasts who love to take advantage of the area’s easy access to mountains, rivers and lakes. No matter the season, there is an outdoor activity closeby. Denver’s high quality of life is a major draw for many residents, as well as all the amenities of downtown. With boutique shopping, dining, and endless entertainment, the area has been supremely popular with millennials. Due to the area’s spike in demand, home prices have grown rapidly, causing many first time home buyers to search further out from the downtown center. 

10. Riverside, CA

Median home price: $475,050
Home price change: +5.5 percent
Sales change: +12.2 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +17.9 percent

Located in the Inland Empire, Riverside, Calif., is named for its location along the Santa Ana River. Riverside draws many people who want to take advantage of Southern California’s temperate weather, but don’t want to pay Los Angeles or Orange County home prices. Riverside is centrally located, just 30 minutes to the beach, mountains or desert, making it a great location for anyone that loves to be outdoors. Additionally, it’s in close proximity to Southern California’s attractions of Disneyland in Anaheim, skiing in the San Bernardino Mountains, wine tasting in Temecula or the endless entertainment in Los Angeles. Due to Southern California’s high cost of living, Riverside’s relative affordability and strong school system including Riverside Stem Academy(9/10 greatschools.org), have made it a popular destination for first time homebuyers, growing families, and retirees.   


2021 Top Housing Markets Ranked

Rank*Metro2021 Sales Growth % y/y2021 Price Growth % y/yCombined Growth
1Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif.17.2%7.4%24.6%
2San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.10.8%10.8%21.6%
3Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C.13.8%5.2%19.0%
4Boise City, Idaho9.8%9.1%18.9%
5Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash.8.9%9.7%18.6%
6Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz.11.4%7.0%18.4%
7Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa.14.4%3.8%18.2%
8Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif.12.5%5.5%18.0%
9Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo.12.5%5.4%17.9%
10Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif.12.4%5.5%17.9%
11Columbus, Ohio10.3%7.6%17.9%
12Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn.9.7%7.8%17.5%
13Fresno, Calif.8.9%8.5%17.4%
14Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif.10.0%7.3%17.3%
15Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev.12.0%5.2%17.2%
16El Paso, Texas10.6%6.4%17.0%
17North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Fla.10.3%6.6%16.9%
18San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif.11.3%5.5%16.8%
19Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Fla.11.6%4.7%16.3%
20Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla.8.7%7.5%16.2%
21Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla.10.1%5.8%15.9%
22Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas11.3%4.4%15.7%
23Kansas City, Mo.-Kan.12.1%3.5%15.6%
24Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn.12.1%3.4%15.5%
25Jacksonville, Fla.9.4%5.0%14.4%
26Stockton-Lodi, Calif.8.2%6.1%14.3%
27Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash.8.1%6.2%14.3%
28Bakersfield, Calif.10.5%3.7%14.2%
29Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark.9.1%4.8%13.9%
30Charleston-North Charleston, S.C.9.5%4.3%13.8%
31McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas10.0%3.6%13.6%
32Knoxville, Tenn.7.9%5.7%13.6%
33Rochester, N.Y.8.4%5.1%13.5%
34Columbia, S.C.8.1%5.4%13.5%
35Pittsburgh, Pa.9.2%4.1%13.3%
36Salt Lake City, Utah7.5%5.7%13.2%
37Austin-Round Rock, Texas8.4%4.6%13.0%
38Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich9.1%3.6%12.7%
39Springfield, Mass.8.1%4.2%12.3%
40Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis.6.3%6.0%12.3%
41Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.-Md.-W. Va.5.2%6.7%11.9%
42Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis.8.3%3.5%11.8%
43New Haven-Milford, Conn.8.6%3.1%11.7%
44Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, Fla.5.4%6.3%11.7%
45Colorado Springs, Colo.5.4%6.2%11.6%
46Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md.7.0%4.5%11.5%
47San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas7.2%4.3%11.5%
48Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind.7.0%4.2%11.2%
49Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H.5.4%5.7%11.1%
50Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md.4.8%6.2%11.0%
51Greensboro-High Point, N.C.6.8%4.1%10.9%
52Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N.Y.7.1%3.7%10.8%
53Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla.3.7%7.1%10.8%
54Richmond, Va.6.2%4.5%10.7%
55Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa.6.1%4.5%10.6%
56Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y.6.3%4.0%10.3%
57Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla.5.1%4.9%10.0%
58Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass.4.5%5.5%10.0%
59Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C.8.1%1.8%9.9%
60Raleigh, N.C.6.0%3.9%9.9%
61Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas5.3%4.6%9.9%
62Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga.3.6%6.2%9.8%
63Des Moines-West Des Moines, Iowa6.9%2.8%9.7%
64San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif.1.3%8.4%9.7%
65Akron, Ohio5.3%4.2%9.5%
66New Orleans-Metairie, La.5.3%4.2%9.5%
67Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio6.7%2.7%9.4%
68Spokane-Spokane Valley, Wash.3.8%5.6%9.4%
69Baton Rouge, La.6.5%2.6%9.1%
70Durham-Chapel Hill, N.C.4.8%4.3%9.1%
71Oklahoma City, Okla.5.8%3.0%8.8%
72Syracuse, N.Y.4.2%4.6%8.8%
73Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind.4.9%3.8%8.7%
74Chattanooga, Tenn.-Ga.4.9%3.5%8.4%
75Portland-South Portland, Maine2.0%6.4%8.4%
76Augusta-Richmond County, Ga.-S.C.5.1%3.2%8.3%
77Worcester, Mass.-Conn.3.5%4.5%8.0%
78Tucson, Ariz.3.4%4.5%7.9%
79Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn.3.1%4.8%7.9%
80Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, Pa.6.7%1.1%7.8%
81Albuquerque, N.M.4.5%3.2%7.7%
82Toledo, Ohio3.9%3.3%7.2%
83St. Louis, Mo.-Ill.3.4%3.8%7.2%
84Jackson, Miss.5.3%1.9%7.2%
85Madison, Wis.5.1%2.1%7.2%
86Winston-Salem, N.C.2.6%4.4%7.0%
87Birmingham-Hoover, Ala.3.7%3.2%6.9%
88Urban Honolulu, Hawaii5.2%1.6%6.8%
89Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind.4.1%2.3%6.4%
90Omaha-Council Bluffs, Neb.-Iowa1.4%4.9%6.3%
91Wichita, Kan.2.4%3.4%5.8%
92Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla.1.5%4.3%5.8%
93Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, S.C.4.3%1.3%5.6%
94Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis.0.5%4.8%5.3%
95Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pa.-N.J.0.3%4.9%5.2%
96Tulsa, Okla.2.7%2.0%4.7%
97Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, Ark.1.9%1.5%3.4%
98Dayton, Ohio0.7%1.7%2.4%
99Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich-2.8%4.9%2.1%
100New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa.-3.8%0.5%-3.3%

*Ranked by Combined Growth. In cases of a tie, Sales Growth y/y was used as a tiebreaker.


Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates and notifications on the latest data and research.

Asset Based Lending for Real Estate Investors

Maximize Your Borrowing Capacity With Asset Based Lending

Asset based lending is the process by which a person can acquire a loan, not based on the personal assets they have or the salary they earn, but by the real estate they currently own and its propensity to make money. The process of getting an asset based loan–a specific type of bridge loan (12-24 months) used only for investment and commercial properties–is generally quicker than dealing with institutional banks, requires less paperwork, and means that you will have cash in hand faster to spend more money and grow your business.

Asset based financing is helpful if you have had bad credit or a foreclosure, and are having trouble getting a loan from traditional banks. It is also helpful if you are experiencing rapid growth in your real estate investing and need the capital to continue the process.

How Asset Based Lending Works

In asset based lending, hard money lenders use your collateral, in this case real estate, to help you acquire additional cash to fund further projects. If your money is tied up in real estate, it is not liquid, and if your company is growing fast, odds are you need more cash to continue growing. This is where hard money lending comes in.

Hard money lenders can get cash in your hand more quickly than typical financial institutions, and the process requires less paperwork and offers more flexibility. Along with the equity in your current real estate assets, a hard money lender will look at accounts receivable, equipment, and inventory to determine your loan. Because the real estate itself is not liquid and you are not borrowing on your personal income, hard money lenders will usually have a higher interest rate than traditional banks.

What Do Hard Money Lenders Do?

In the fast paced real estate market, you don’t want to miss out on great deals just because your assets are not liquid. Hard money lenders at Stratton Equities will look at your assets and determine the maximum amount for your credit line. You can borrow as needed, and your credit base will shrink or grow as your assets change.

Keeping this line of credit open will allow you to grow your business and give you cash in hand, without waiting for your own cash receipts to catch up. This will also allow the hard money lenders the peace of mind that you have assets to forfeit if for some reason you default on your loan.

Benefits of Asset Based Lending

Whether you are trying to figure out how to finance a house flip or need a new construction loan, there are several benefits to acquiring asset based financing:

  • These loans are typically faster than a traditional loan, and require less documentation and paperwork. In addition to closing faster than a term loan, these loans have fewer underwriting guidelines and higher interest rates.
  • The cash flow asset based lending offers can bridge the gap between expenditures and incoming cash receipts for your business.
  • The loan can grow as your assets grow, leaving you with more liquidity to purchase more real estate.
  • The loan money can be used as you need it, and is not tied to a certain purpose (such as equipment purchase.)

Through asset based lending, Muevo Investments will make it easy to turn your collateral into cash, so you can finance your next big idea. If you have an investment or commercial property and wish to speak with one of our Loan Officers, Muevo Investments at 217-799-0156, email us today!

Top Housing Markets for 2021

Realtor.com’s top 10 housing markets for 2021 have substantial momentum from 2020 which they will carry into 2021. Still low mortgage rates throughout most of the year help these markets see price and sales growth on top of 2020’s high levels. Economic momentum from the thriving tech industry, coupled with healthier levels of supply, will position these markets for growth in 2021. This past year, we’ve all become more reliant on technology to work, learn, and maintain personal connections. The technology hubs that make this possible are thriving, as are their housing markets. Additionally, the relative stability of government jobs in the past year has driven home prices and sales in several state capitals to the top. Home buyers, particularly younger first-time buyers, looking in one of these markets should expect rising prices and heavy competition. Meanwhile, sellers will remain in a position of power, but will find themselves on the other side of the bargaining table when buying their next home.

Top 10 Housing Markets Positioned for Growth in 2021
Rank*Metro2021 Sales Growth % y/y2021 Price Growth % y/yCombined Growth
1Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif.17.2%7.4%24.6%
2San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.10.8%10.8%21.6%
3Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C.13.8%5.2%19.0%
4Boise City, Idaho9.8%9.1%18.9%
5Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash.8.9%9.7%18.6%
6Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz.11.4%7.0%18.4%
7Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa.14.4%3.8%18.2%
8Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif.12.5%5.5%18.0%
9Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo.12.5%5.4%17.9%
10Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif.12.4%5.5%17.9%
United States7.0%5.7%12.7%

Ranking is based on the combined yearly percentage growth in both home sales and prices expected in 2021 among the top 100 largest markets in the country per realtor.com’s metro level housing forecast. In cases of a tie, Sales Growth y/y was used as a tiebreaker.

top housing markets 2021
Tech Titans 

A common driver of this year’s top markets is the prevalence of high paying tech jobs. Tech salaries in Sacramento, San Jose, Boise, Denver, and Seattle have driven home prices through the roof over the last several years and this trend is expected to continue in 2021. Additionally, areas such as Charlotte and Phoenix are quickly establishing themselves as rising tech hubs with a plethora of jobs in technology, as well as education, government and healthcare. In fact, the projected unemployment rate for 2021’s top markets is 7.9% compared to the national average of 8.2%. Tech-related jobs make up an average of 8.7% of the workforce in this year’s top markets list compared to 6.4% of the U.S. as a whole. 

Relative Affordability

The top markets in 2021 aren’t cheap. In fact, home prices in eight of the top 10 markets are more expensive than the average of the top 100 markets. But many are relatively affordable when compared to their nearby counterparts or offer significantly more square footage for a similar price. For example, buyers priced out of New York ($216 per sq.ft.) can find increased space and affordability in Harrisburg ($122 per sq.ft.), while buyers in Sacramento ($284 per sq.ft.) can get more bang for their buck than nearby San Francisco ($679 per sq.ft.). This is also true when comparing Oxnard ($413 per sq.ft.) and Riverside ($247 per sq.ft.) with Los Angeles ($556 per sq.ft.).  

Home to Younger Households 

On average, the top 10 markets have a larger share of younger households, aged 25 to 34, (14.1%) than the U.S. as a whole (13.5%). A market’s ability to lure millennials is a good indicator of the livability of the area including: job opportunities, dining, and entertainment. However, when it comes to millennials purchasing homes in the top 10, two trends are emerging. In half of this year’s top markets, including: Charlotte, Boise, Phoenix, Harrisburg and Riverside, millennials are already homeowners and expected to make the majority of the home purchases that drive home price growth and sales. In the other group of markets, such as San Jose, Seattle, and Denver, the high cost of living has made homeownership a difficult accomplishment, not only for millennials but for all generations. The high number of millennials in the market shows how popular these markets have become, but older, more financially established generations will be the ones purchasing the majority of the homes next year. 

State Capitals 

Half of the top markets are state capitals, including: Sacramento, Boise, Phoenix, Harrisburg and Denver. The strong government presence in these areas offers stability for their local economy and jobs markets. This is especially important after a year when a global pandemic has significantly disrupted local economies across the nation. On top of the government jobs, these areas also have strong job diversity in both the public and private sectors, including education, healthcare, technology, manufacturing and military, which is positioning them for solid growth in the future. The average GDP growth rate for the top markets is forecasted to be 5.34% in 2021, versus 4.85% for the top 100 metros. 

Key Stats for Top 10 Housing Markets in 2021 
Top 10 Markets (Avg)Largest 100 Markets (Avg)
Sales % Change YoY 2021 (projected)+13.1%+6.8%
Price % Change YoY 2021 (projected)+6.9%+4.7%
Median List Price 2020$586,200$371,500
Median List Price YoY 2019+7.6%+4.3%
Households YoY 2021 (projected)+0.98%+0.53%

2021 Top 10 Housing Markets 

1. Sacramento, CA

Median home price: $554,050
Home price change: +7.4 percent
Sales change: +17.2 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +24.6 percent

Sacramento takes first place on this year’s top markets list. Due to the increased freedom to work remotely, buyers from the San Francisco Bay Area are flocking to California’s state capital for the increased affordability, without having to completely uproot their lives in Northern California. The area draws a diverse crowd ranging from first time homebuyers to empty nesters looking to downsize. Many young families are also drawn to Sacramento for the area’s strong school system, including West Campus high school which has a 99% graduation rate and received a 10/10 on greatschools.org. When residents want a change of scenery, it’s a short trip to Lake Tahoe, wine country or San Francisco. 

2. San Jose, CA

Median home price: $1,199,050
Home price change: +10.8 percent
Sales change: +10.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +21.6 percent

Also located in Northern California, San Jose is the largest city in Silicon Valley. Apple, Google, Facebook, Linkedin and even realtor.com® are all within commuting distance of San Jose. Unsurprisingly, the area’s strong economy and top notch school system, including Lynbrook High School (10/10 greatschools.org), lure top tech talent from all over the country. Those looking for a change of scenery can easily drive to San Francisco or the nearby mountains. Without a ton of room for new construction, inventory in the area is tight, so serious buyers should expect to pay above asking price.  

3. Charlotte, NC

Median home price: $368,819
Home price change: +5.2 percent
Sales change: +13.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +19.0 percent

Rounding out the top three on this year’s top markets list is Charlotte. The area’s high quality of life, great weather, strong school system including Providence High (10/10 greatschools.org) and rich history draw a diverse mix of both young and old buyers. Millennials are beginning to transition from the downtown city center toward the suburbs as they raise families and take advantage of the increased affordability and extra space. With access to both the beach and mountains, Charlotte has something for everyone, including kayaking along the Catawba River and hiking the Carolina Thread Trail. Housing supply has been tight, but new construction is booming as builders try to meet current demand. Charlotte was No. 7 on 2018’s top markets list. 

4. Boise, ID

Median home price: $445,000
Home price change: +9.1 percent
Sales change: +9.8 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.9 percent

Idaho’s capital city is firmly establishing itself as a rising tech hub in the U.S. The area’s high quality of life and strong economy draw people from all over the country, with the biggest influx coming from Washington, Oregon and California. This trend has accelerated as the ability to work remotely has drawn many young workers looking for a slower pace of life, increased affordability, and access to the area’s many outdoor amenities. Boise offers residents a mild four season climate, a vibrant revitalized downtown with plenty of entertainment, as well as a plethora of restaurants and boutique shopping. Outdoor enthusiasts are drawn to the area’s adrenaline pumping outdoor activities such as white water rafting and four different ski resorts. New construction has been booming in Boise over the past few years as builders scramble to keep up with rising demand. Boise is no stranger to realtor.com®‘s Top Markets list, it was No. 1 in 2020 and No. 8 in 2019. 

5. Seattle, WA

Median home price: $629,050
Home price change: +9.7 percent
Sales change: +8.9 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.6 percent

Coming in fifth is Seattle, which is home to some of America’s largest and most well known companies including: Amazon, Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and Nordstrom. The area’s booming tech scene, high quality of life, and access to both the water and mountains draws a crowd from all over the country. New and growing families will find a strong school system, including Greenwood Elementary School which scored a perfect 10/10 on greatschools.org, as well as four other schools which received scores of 9/10. Driven by high home prices and the desire for more space, buyers are beginning to search for homes further from the downtown center. This is especially true for first time homebuyers. 

6. Phoenix, AZ

Median home price: $412,260
Home price change: +7.0 percent
Sales change: +11.4 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.4 percent

Arizona’s state capital has become a magnet for both younger buyers looking to take advantage of the affordable cost of living, as well as retirees who want to soak up the sun. Recently, the area has seen a large influx of people from pricey West Coast markets — San Francisco, Seattle and Portland. While builders have struggled to meet the rising demand for housing, Phoenix set a record for new home permits in March, April and May, so new inventory is on the way. Phoenix offers residents all the big city amenities of shopping, dining and entertainment, without the traffic of larger metropolitan cities. Additionally, those who want to get out and hit the golf course have over 400 courses to choose from. Phoenix is a business friendly city and has a diverse list of large employers in both the public and private sectors from education, government and healthcare to technology, manufacturing and military. Phoenix was No. 5 on 2019’s top markets list. 

7. Harrisburg, PA

Median home price: $262,000
Home price change: +3.8 percent
Sales change: +14.4 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.2 percent

The state capital of Pennsylvania has become a hot spot for buyers looking for the quiet suburban lifestyle, more space, and increased affordability. Harrisburg is centrally located near New York, Baltimore, Washington D.C., Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Millennials in particular have been drawn to the area as both first time homebuyers and move-up buyers looking for more space for their growing families. Harrisburg boasts a strong job market not only for government employees working at the state capital, but those in healthcare and shipping industries as well. One of the biggest draws to the area is the ability to go from downtown, to the suburbs, to more rural areas, in under 15 minutes.  

8. Oxnard, CA

Median home price: $824,000
Home price change: +5.5 percent
Sales change: +12.5 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +18.0 percent

Located north of Los Angeles on the Pacific Coast is Oxnard, Calif. The area is a mix of farmland and Pacific Coast beaches, such as Hollywood Beach — a second home market for wealthy Angelanos looking for a break from the hustle and bustle of city life. Farmers in the area grow strawberries and lima beans and the annual Strawberry Festival is a big draw for Southern California locals. Thanks to its affordability, the area has seen a boost in demand from buyers seeking relief from Los Angeles and Orange County home prices. Beach homes in the area are significantly more affordable than those in Malibu or Santa Monica, making this a popular alternative for buyers hoping to get more bang for their buck. 

9. Denver, CO

Median home price: $520,000
Home price change: +5.4 percent
Sales change: +12.5 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +17.9 percent

Colorado’s state capitol is located just outside of the Rocky Mountains. The area’s housing market has been red-hot for the last several years and builders have struggled to keep up with the high demand for housing. Though the city is rapidly expanding, it still holds much of its Old West charm, and its cost of living remains relatively affordable compared to other Western markets. Many of Denver’s residents are outdoor enthusiasts who love to take advantage of the area’s easy access to mountains, rivers and lakes. No matter the season, there is an outdoor activity closeby. Denver’s high quality of life is a major draw for many residents, as well as all the amenities of downtown. With boutique shopping, dining, and endless entertainment, the area has been supremely popular with millennials. Due to the area’s spike in demand, home prices have grown rapidly, causing many first time home buyers to search further out from the downtown center. 

10. Riverside, CA

Median home price: $475,050
Home price change: +5.5 percent
Sales change: +12.2 percent
Combined sales and price growth: +17.9 percent

Located in the Inland Empire, Riverside, Calif., is named for its location along the Santa Ana River. Riverside draws many people who want to take advantage of Southern California’s temperate weather, but don’t want to pay Los Angeles or Orange County home prices. Riverside is centrally located, just 30 minutes to the beach, mountains or desert, making it a great location for anyone that loves to be outdoors. Additionally, it’s in close proximity to Southern California’s attractions of Disneyland in Anaheim, skiing in the San Bernardino Mountains, wine tasting in Temecula or the endless entertainment in Los Angeles. Due to Southern California’s high cost of living, Riverside’s relative affordability and strong school system including Riverside Stem Academy(9/10 greatschools.org), have made it a popular destination for first time homebuyers, growing families, and retirees.   


2021 Top Housing Markets Ranked

Rank*Metro2021 Sales Growth % y/y2021 Price Growth % y/yCombined Growth
1Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif.17.2%7.4%24.6%
2San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.10.8%10.8%21.6%
3Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C.13.8%5.2%19.0%
4Boise City, Idaho9.8%9.1%18.9%
5Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash.8.9%9.7%18.6%
6Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz.11.4%7.0%18.4%
7Harrisburg-Carlisle, Pa.14.4%3.8%18.2%
8Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif.12.5%5.5%18.0%
9Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo.12.5%5.4%17.9%
10Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif.12.4%5.5%17.9%
11Columbus, Ohio10.3%7.6%17.9%
12Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn.9.7%7.8%17.5%
13Fresno, Calif.8.9%8.5%17.4%
14Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif.10.0%7.3%17.3%
15Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev.12.0%5.2%17.2%
16El Paso, Texas10.6%6.4%17.0%
17North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Fla.10.3%6.6%16.9%
18San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif.11.3%5.5%16.8%
19Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Fla.11.6%4.7%16.3%
20Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla.8.7%7.5%16.2%
21Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla.10.1%5.8%15.9%
22Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas11.3%4.4%15.7%
23Kansas City, Mo.-Kan.12.1%3.5%15.6%
24Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn.12.1%3.4%15.5%
25Jacksonville, Fla.9.4%5.0%14.4%
26Stockton-Lodi, Calif.8.2%6.1%14.3%
27Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash.8.1%6.2%14.3%
28Bakersfield, Calif.10.5%3.7%14.2%
29Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark.9.1%4.8%13.9%
30Charleston-North Charleston, S.C.9.5%4.3%13.8%
31McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas10.0%3.6%13.6%
32Knoxville, Tenn.7.9%5.7%13.6%
33Rochester, N.Y.8.4%5.1%13.5%
34Columbia, S.C.8.1%5.4%13.5%
35Pittsburgh, Pa.9.2%4.1%13.3%
36Salt Lake City, Utah7.5%5.7%13.2%
37Austin-Round Rock, Texas8.4%4.6%13.0%
38Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich9.1%3.6%12.7%
39Springfield, Mass.8.1%4.2%12.3%
40Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis.6.3%6.0%12.3%
41Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.-Md.-W. Va.5.2%6.7%11.9%
42Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis.8.3%3.5%11.8%
43New Haven-Milford, Conn.8.6%3.1%11.7%
44Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, Fla.5.4%6.3%11.7%
45Colorado Springs, Colo.5.4%6.2%11.6%
46Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md.7.0%4.5%11.5%
47San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas7.2%4.3%11.5%
48Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind.7.0%4.2%11.2%
49Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H.5.4%5.7%11.1%
50Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md.4.8%6.2%11.0%
51Greensboro-High Point, N.C.6.8%4.1%10.9%
52Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N.Y.7.1%3.7%10.8%
53Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla.3.7%7.1%10.8%
54Richmond, Va.6.2%4.5%10.7%
55Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa.6.1%4.5%10.6%
56Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y.6.3%4.0%10.3%
57Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla.5.1%4.9%10.0%
58Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass.4.5%5.5%10.0%
59Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C.8.1%1.8%9.9%
60Raleigh, N.C.6.0%3.9%9.9%
61Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas5.3%4.6%9.9%
62Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga.3.6%6.2%9.8%
63Des Moines-West Des Moines, Iowa6.9%2.8%9.7%
64San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif.1.3%8.4%9.7%
65Akron, Ohio5.3%4.2%9.5%
66New Orleans-Metairie, La.5.3%4.2%9.5%
67Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio6.7%2.7%9.4%
68Spokane-Spokane Valley, Wash.3.8%5.6%9.4%
69Baton Rouge, La.6.5%2.6%9.1%
70Durham-Chapel Hill, N.C.4.8%4.3%9.1%
71Oklahoma City, Okla.5.8%3.0%8.8%
72Syracuse, N.Y.4.2%4.6%8.8%
73Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind.4.9%3.8%8.7%
74Chattanooga, Tenn.-Ga.4.9%3.5%8.4%
75Portland-South Portland, Maine2.0%6.4%8.4%
76Augusta-Richmond County, Ga.-S.C.5.1%3.2%8.3%
77Worcester, Mass.-Conn.3.5%4.5%8.0%
78Tucson, Ariz.3.4%4.5%7.9%
79Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn.3.1%4.8%7.9%
80Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, Pa.6.7%1.1%7.8%
81Albuquerque, N.M.4.5%3.2%7.7%
82Toledo, Ohio3.9%3.3%7.2%
83St. Louis, Mo.-Ill.3.4%3.8%7.2%
84Jackson, Miss.5.3%1.9%7.2%
85Madison, Wis.5.1%2.1%7.2%
86Winston-Salem, N.C.2.6%4.4%7.0%
87Birmingham-Hoover, Ala.3.7%3.2%6.9%
88Urban Honolulu, Hawaii5.2%1.6%6.8%
89Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind.4.1%2.3%6.4%
90Omaha-Council Bluffs, Neb.-Iowa1.4%4.9%6.3%
91Wichita, Kan.2.4%3.4%5.8%
92Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla.1.5%4.3%5.8%
93Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, S.C.4.3%1.3%5.6%
94Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis.0.5%4.8%5.3%
95Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pa.-N.J.0.3%4.9%5.2%
96Tulsa, Okla.2.7%2.0%4.7%
97Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, Ark.1.9%1.5%3.4%
98Dayton, Ohio0.7%1.7%2.4%
99Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich-2.8%4.9%2.1%
100New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa.-3.8%0.5%-3.3%

*Ranked by Combined Growth. In cases of a tie, Sales Growth y/y was used as a tiebreaker.

The New, Old Real Estate: Capturing Value, Sustainability, and Community Impact by Repositioning Older Buildings

In dense urban markets, repurposing existing buildings offers a sometimes-hidden opportunity to unlock enormous value while drastically reducing the environmental impact of construction.

In the recent ULI webinar titled Breathing New Life into Old Bones, part of the 2020 ULI Spring Meeting Webinar Series, four experts in design, development, and sustainability explored the opportunities and challenges inherent in repositioning buildings.

This webinar is available on demand to ULI Full members and for purchase as part of the 2020 ULI Spring Meeting Webinar Series.

Working creatively with zoning, floor/area ratios, public incentives, and financing is key to making these projects possible. Making them successful often requires finding the design elements within the project that tell a story, creating a strong narrative for brand authenticity and reflecting the community character and history of the building.

“We often find [that older buildings] have inherent structural flexibility to adapt to multiple use types, and there is a historic narrative that establishes sense of place and character that creates value. There’s also an embedded sustainability to using existing buildings and shells,” says Matt Stephenson, associate principal with Woods Bagot Architects.

The design, planning, and construction challenges to renovating older buildings can be complex, but value can be created by upgrading buildings from lower-income-generating uses (light industrial, manufacturing, storage, shipping) to higher-income-generating uses like residential, office, retail, or hospitality, according to Jeremy Plofker, vice president of Madison Realty Capital. “Often, the most value that can be created from an asset [comes from] combining higher-income uses with each other or with lower-income uses,” Plofker says.

The panelists presented four case studies of projects that had transformed older office, hospitality, industrial, or storage buildings to mixed-use, residential, or commercial uses with high-value amenities, rents, and energy cost savings that provided the returns needed to make the projects work.

A 1912 Manhattan office building originally inhabited by the Emigrant National Savings Bank and then by New York City government offices, 49 Chambers was converted into luxury residential apartments. New lot-line windows were added to make up for the deep floor plate, and mechanical systems in the basement and roof were consolidated to make room for a large swimming pool and roof deck. The building’s large windows and unique grand hall on the ground floor encouraged the preservation of features that would create a strong building identity.

Another project went even further in reshaping building footprints for new purposes. At Gramercy Square, a former medical center also being converted into housing, the design team noted that several buildings of the complex would block light and air for other buildings, and decided to demolish them.

“We found built areas that didn’t make sense, removed those, and moved them to where they made more sense,” Stephenson says. They relocated the resulting extra floor area atop other buildings in the complex and were even able to create an entirely new building as well, which “made the whole project commercially feasible,” he adds.

Balancing sustainability with the historical aesthetic was an important consideration on this project—since each building needed facade adjustments, the redesign included energy modeling on the building envelope to determine how to reduce energy use and expenses while keeping occupants comfortable. “We added new cladding to create light and air, with character and texture for the neighborhood, but it also performed well,” says Ben Shepherd, consultant on the project and director at Atelier Ten.

Shepherd also notes the broader opportunities for sustainability on repositioning projects. “You can look at more than just lighting retrofits; you can look at passive shading, or alternative ventilation and conditioning strategies, to dramatically lower the energy intensity of these projects and make sure things like rooftop solar systems have more bang for your buck.”

In addition, reusing old building shells is a major advantage from an emissions perspective. “Repurposing projects takes advantage of the carbon already locked up,” in existing buildings, Shepherd says. “By reusing existing foundations, structures, and enclosures, it saves carbon from being emitted to create new materials,” like concrete or steel, for new construction. The carbon emissions released to produce, transport, and install building materials are known as embodied carbonFor more on this topic, see ULI Greenprint’s Embodied Carbon in Building Materials for Real Estate report.

Repositioning projects can also respond to changing market conditions. On Union Crossing, an industrial-to-commercial conversion in the South Bronx neighborhood of New York City, Plofker notes that “there was no existing market for commercial use, especially flexible commercial use like this, so it took a little bit of a leap of faith” to embark on the project. However, based on trends in nearby neighborhoods, Madison Realty bet that the project “could meet a need that wasn’t being met.” To ensure the project would be resilient to unforeseen market shifts, the design expanded the already-large floor plates so that the space could remain as flexible as possible, and “any number of uses and types of tenants could be accommodated in the future.”

Besides using efficient windows to keep energy use and HVAC costs down, Union Crossing also made sure to use sustainable and healthy materials throughout the building, and to specify the same for tenant finishes. “It’s getting easier to do, as tenants are looking for these aspects in base building spaces, and thankfully they can be achieved with minimal price point,” Shepherd says.

These redevelopment projects are also opportunities to blend value creation and sustainability with community impact. Ponce City Market, an Atlanta warehouse converted into office, retail, and residential uses in 2015 by Jamestown Properties, achieved three separate Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold certifications and also incorporated a neighborhood employment program and workforce housing, which was a key part of “becoming integrated into the fabric of the community,” according to Becca Rushin, vice president of sustainability and social responsibility at Jamestown.

Successful projects like Ponce can even stimulate neighborhood-wide redevelopment. “This was the first project in what was essentially an abandoned block, and [since then] we’ve seen a huge boom in the neighborhood—lots of residential construction—and as we’ve proven the market for class A office space, we’ve seen a lot more office products being constructed as well,” Rushin says.

Overall, building repositioning may take on even greater importance in the post-coronavirus city, as doubt may be sown about the value inherent in dense cities. “As urbanists, we still believe cities serve a really important function as places to gather and share ideas,” Stephenson says. “The quality of these buildings and spaces will continue to play an essential role in framing public and private moments in the future.”


https://urbanland.uli.org/sustainability/the-new-old-real-estate-capturing-value-sustainability-and-community-impact-by-repositioning-older-buildings/

What will the rest of the year spell for the housing market?

Mending from the sudden sharp drop in activity due to the coronavirus crisis, real estate across the United States is heating up, rekindled by growing demand and insufficient supply.

The National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) pending home sales index, a future-looking indicator of completed sales based on signed contracts, posted a staggering comeback in May, the latest month for which data is available. The index spiked 44.3 percent, registering the highest month-over-month increase since its inception in 2001.

First-time home buyers Stuyve Pierrepont and his wife said they have seen this shift occur almost overnight.

The Pierreponts, who work in the District and previously rented in Northern Virginia, renewed their 18-month home search in early 2020. Prior to the viral outbreak, the couple looked at roughly a dozen homes. During the pandemic, they only saw four residences in person. But the couple wasn’t ready for the speed with which fellow home shoppers were scooping those houses off the market.

The couple toured a house in Annapolis, Md., for example, which went under contract later the same day. “There were a couple of times when we saw places we really wanted, and they sold before we could act,” Pierrepont said. “We were really discouraged by that fact.”

Their real estate agent, Shane Hall of the Shane Hall Group, newly associated with Compass and formerly with TTR Sotheby’s, said in late June that Annapolis, which lies less than an hour east of the District, had a single month of supply, meaning that if no new listings were to come on the market, all existing stock would be purchased in 30 days.


“That’s incredibly rare,” Hall said. “We just don’t have a ton of inventory. And we have a lot of demand.”

Impact of mortgage rates 

With the country’s economy tentatively reopening and shelter-in-place restrictions easing, housing experts forecast that home sales will rise through the summer. The biggest constraint is the number of listings, which are returning to the market only gingerly compared to the appetite for them.

The latter is in part whetted by historically low mortgage rates that are now hovering at 3.03 percent, about 2 percentage points below their level about a mere 18 months ago and where they are expected to remain this year. Annualized new mortgage applications have trended up for weeks.

“Today’s low mortgage rates are a true game changer,” said Ali Wolf, chief economist at Meyers Research, a new-home data and consulting firm. “As the economy reopens, it comes down to four words: fear of missing out.”

Home buyers’ vigor has powered the national housing market, despite declines in mostly all economic indicators. For the most part, home showings — enhanced with hand sanitizer and face masks — have continued throughout the pandemic. The various services supporting the industry, from inspections to closings, have shifted to alternative modes such as the Internet, staying operational. And with the start of summer, home shoppers’ desire to make what is probably the largest financial commitment in their lives — in such an uncharted time — hasn’t seemed to slacken.

Home financing ‘hit a perfect storm’ with virus and the economic downturn

“If anything, that seems to be a ray of sunlight: We’re seeing buyers more active than expected,” said George Ratiu, senior economist with listing website Realtor.com. “Looking at our weekly inventory statistics, we’re seeing that total listings are down partly because new listings are down. But [also because] those homes that are on the market are clearly finding buyers quickly and that’s key.”

For instance, in the Tampa area in Florida, which has seen an influx of buyers from the Northeast because of the pandemic, active upscale inventory through June 23 was 26 percent lower than a year ago, said Jennifer Zales, luxury real estate agent with Coldwell Banker. At the same time, however, completed sales of homes above $1 million totaled 109, or three more than for the whole of June 2019, Zales said. Meanwhile, a little over 230 residences asking $1 million and up, including condos, townhouses and single-family houses, were under contract.

“We have a lot of pent-up demand from the spring season that did not happen,” Zales said. “I feel like somebody took my regular summer season, which is usually very regular, but dumps the whole spring season on top of the summer season. We’re extremely busy.”

This appears to be the latest recurring theme across the United States, even if the summer months traditionally are calmer with vacations and family activities stealing the focus from buying or selling a house. Beyond the next couple of months, angst about the fall, when the uncertainty of the presidential election mixes with a still-wobbly economic outlook and fears of a second wave of coronavirus infections, still permeates forecasts.

Sellers remain cautious 

When the pandemic seized the country, sellers retreated faster and in larger numbers than buyers, prompting the nationwide inventory of homes to dip precipitously. After somewhat recovering from an all-time low in April, new listings remained about 22 percent below their level from a year ago in May, according to real estate brokerage Redfin.

This has not only exacerbated the chronic shortage of homes for sale, it has done so during the months when sellers are typically most engaged. A forecast by Realtor.com indicated the loss of spring inventory would translate to 15 percent fewer sales of existing homes in 2020.

“I think people are prepared to stay in their houses longer,” said Hall. “That was already a trend that’s been going on for the last five to 10 years.”

Despite a market tipped in their favor, sellers, especially those who still live in their residences, remain reluctant about letting strangers in. Increasing coronavirus infection rates in some states might strengthen this disinclination.

Moreover, home sellers are often also shoppers. Those not pressed to move might be loath to search for their next home amid tight inventory and rising competition. “It is now amazing to sell,” said Hall. “It is not amazing to buy.”

Yet Katie Day, a Houston-based real estate agent with Coldwell Banker, said she expects more homeowners to enter the market later this year to finally chase the housing aesthetics the pandemic has advanced as priorities.

“Probably toward the latter part of this year and into 2021, we will see more preference changes with people wanting to have a bigger home or wanting additional amenities in their house,” Day said.

Day’s remarks align with Realtor.com’s projection of a gradual increase of new listings through August before their numbers again hit the “historical trend” from September through December, when fewer homeowners generally decide to sell.

Appeal of new construction 

Because of the restricted supply of existing homes for sale, some buyers have flocked to new construction, especially single-family houses that, unlike their pre-owned counterparts that have been occupied, pose less risk associated with the coronavirus — and are more customizable.

Sales of newly built houses rose nearly 13 percent year-over-year in May, growing at a rate for that month not seen in more than a decade, according to the Census Bureau.

“There are just so few homes on the market today compared to last year, and last year already had historically low inventory levels,” said Wolf. “So, builders have been capturing market share left and right, selling homes at record May levels.”

Homebuilding in the pandemic

This positive dynamic, though, might not alleviate the overall shortage of inventory. For years, builders have strained to build homes fast enough to meet demand. And, Wolf said, many of them have already sold their standing inventory in 2020. The Census Bureau’s data shows that most contracts in May were inked for houses under construction.

Meanwhile, new permits and housing starts in May continued to lag year-over-year, which could reflect builders’ sustained struggles in filling construction jobs and acquiring materials.

“The home supply shortage as the economy opens up is going to be even more severe,” Wolf said, “unless we all of a sudden see more existing homeowners put their homes on the market.”

Prices are rising 

The pronounced seller’s market has buoyed home values, contrary to early expectations of deflated prices resulting from a coronavirus-chilled real estate industry.

“We’re going to have this really surprising situation where, even though demand has certainly been impacted by the much weaker job market, supply has fallen even more,” said Mike Fratantoni, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “Prices, as a result, are going up at the time that we’re in, in this very deep crisis.”

In May, the median price for all existing home types notched up 2.3 percent to $284,600, marking 99 straight months of yearly gains, the NAR reported. According to Realtor.com, in the third week of June, median asking prices grew at an annual rate of 5.6 percent, surpassing their pre-coronavirus pace.

“The increase in prices is fairly universal across most markets,” said Ratiu.

But not all cities have experienced price spikes.

A viral hot spot for months, New York City, for instance, saw the median sale price in its spiffiest borough, Manhattan, decrease about 18 percent  in the second quarter, the largest annual slump in a decade, according to a joint report by real estate brokerage Douglas Elliman and real estate appraisal and consulting firm Miller Samuel.

In fact, median asking prices in May fell in all five boroughs, with the highest drop approximately 5 percent in Manhattan, according to Realtor.com.

The deflated home values rest on the backdrop of record low sales, which were a mere half of their year-ago number of 2,730. This is the most pronounced decline in 30 years of record-keeping.

The real estate industry in the city, though, only formally reopened in the second half of June with agents optimistic about a slow but steady recovery and even a silver lining for some home shoppers.

“For people who have been trying to move to Manhattan for a while and felt it’s so expensive, there’s some opportunity now for them to buy something they can afford,” said broker Lisa K. Lippman with Brown Harris Stevens.

Pace of sales quickens 

Betsey Rider, who works in luxury goods sales and lives in Annapolis, and her husband, who is retiring this December, readied to sell their four-bedroom house, rebuilt a decade ago, later this year so they could move to a warmer climate.

But in the early days of the pandemic outbreak, three homes in their neighborhood of about 250 residences came on the market — and didn’t stay long.

“They sold within days,” Rider said. “I was shocked by that. At first, I found it really interesting that people were still house hunting.”

To tap the current demand and to evade any uncertainties down the road, the Riders decided to list the property. In early May they met with Hall, the Annapolis-based real estate agent, on a Saturday to discuss selling. The next day, having already tapped his industry network, Hall called to say that there were buyers from Texas interested in the home. That Monday, after a day of cleaning, the Riders showed their still-unlisted residence via a video phone call.

The offer followed quickly, a little under the $850,000 the Riders were going to ask. They accepted.

“We were happy with the price and the fact that we never had to list the house and go through all of [that process],” Betsey Rider said. “There were a few things that we were going to do prior to putting the house on the market that we ended up not having to do.”

Housing market shifts to the cyber side amid the pandemic

The sale was completed in late June, after the Riders had already settled in a temporary rental before moving South.

According to the NAR, nearly 60 percent of the homes sold in May found new owners in less than a month. While Realtor.com reported slightly longer lead times, the company anticipates those spans to shrink as home buyers pick up the pace of making offers in competitive markets.

The Pierreponts, the first-time house hunters in the Washington area, experienced that quick tempo first-hand. After several homes they liked vanished to other fast-to-act shoppers, the couple in early June made a successful offer on a house in Deale, Md., about 30 miles east of the District, that had been for sale for a week. Asking $610,000, the residence sits on 1.7 acres and features a chicken coop, enough for the micro garden and farm the couple had dreamed of. The Pierreponts planned to close on the property on Saturday.

“We will still be able to work in Washington, D.C., and follow a career path,” Pierrepont said. “It gave us the best of both worlds in that sense. A longer commute is a small price to pay for having more usable land.”

Rise of smaller markets 

The Pierreponts are among the many buyers who are leaving cities for the suburbs, secondary metropolitan and rural areas. While this exodus underlines Americans’ search for privacy amid the health crisis, it is in large part enabled by the rapid adoption of work-from-home arrangements that a number of companies have said would last beyond the pandemic.

“I believe that this is a permanent change,” said Lawrence Yun, chief economist with the NAR, about the movement to the suburbs and away from densely populated hubs.

Redfin found that a record 27 percent of searchers on its website in April and May looked to relocate, mainly to small towns from large cities.

For instance, New Yorkers have flocked to Florida and Southern California, where properties are generally larger and cheaper. Yet even local buyers in these states are searching for bigger, more remote homes.

Rental market reacts to coronavirus but stays active

“Even though Los Angeles is not a dense city compared to the vertical city that is New York, our local wealthy people are trying to get out to Laguna, Santa Barbara, Malibu, even Palm Springs,” said Ernie Carswell, luxury real estate agent with Douglas Elliman. “They’re buying beach homes. They’re moving farther from our populated areas.”

Cities such as Austin, Indianapolis and Des Moines are welcoming out-of-state home shoppers. Even second-home enclaves and resort towns like Aspen, Colo., are experiencing heightened demand.

“What we are seeing now is a huge uptick [in interest] in properties that are more rural and away from Aspen,” said Raifie Bass, real estate agent with Douglas Elliman. “So a farm or a ranch or a gentleman’s ranch properties that have a little bit more space. That market is stronger than it’s ever been. We’re seeing full-price offers on properties that have been on the market for a long time.”

Suburban and small-town markets are typically cheaper, but Ratiu said the ballooning interest in them would likely push prices up.

Future caveats 

While the U.S. housing market is entering an invigorated summer season, characterized by low mortgage rates, rising home values and steep competition among home shoppers, uncertainty still shrouds the outlook for late 2020.

Even if some predictions point to a V-shaped coronavirus recovery, some forecasts, including Realtor.com’s, say the rebound would actually look like a W. Home selling and purchasing naturally slow down during the colder months, but factors such as a rise in new coronavirus cases and prolonged unemployment would exacerbate any seasonal declines — and soften home values.

“One of my biggest concerns is a second outbreak of the coronavirus and a second lockdown, which will be completely demoralizing, create more economic damage and people will remain unemployed for much longer,” said Yun.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/realestate/uncertainty-shrouds-the-housing-market-through-2020/2020/07/08/1030e93e-bba4-11ea-bdaf-a129f921026f_story.html

Bidding Wars Are Back in Housing Market Stung by Pandemic

Bloomberg) — It’s the surprise of a spring selling season that’s been anything but normal: Buyers returning to the housing market have been battling over the few available properties.

While sales are way down, the lack of inventory has propped up prices and led to bidding wars, even as economic fallout from the pandemic mounts and real estate agents adjust to new public health guidelines that have made it more difficult to market homes.

“Since the pandemic began, demand fell off a cliff,” said Taylor Marr, an economist at Redfin Corp. “What most people overlook is that sellers also pulled back.”

The supply-demand imbalance meant that roughly 40% of homebuyers that Redfin agents worked with recently faced competition when they tried to purchase a home. The rate was even higher in cities like San Francisco, Boston and even Fort Worth, Texas, where more than 60% of properties the company’s clients bid on received multiple offers.

The U.S. housing market went into the Covid crisis with a supply shortage that was driving up prices beyond the reach of many buyers, even with years of low interest rates. That problem hasn’t gone away, despite the economic uncertainty. The number of active listings shrank by almost a quarter in April, compared with a year earlier, according to Redfin.

Still, the market has cooled. Sales of existing homes are projected to fall 20% in April from a month earlier, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg. That would follow an 8.5% drop in March. Construction of new houses plunged by the most on record in April, with builders waiting out the virus. That means new supply will be slower to materialize.

The market dynamics are a shock to some buyers. Kenzo Teves, a 24-year-old business analyst for a pharmaceutical company, decided to start shopping for his first house this spring, because interest rates were so low. He had money saved for a down payment and was secure in his job — factors he thought would help him find a home near Boston.

In late April, he made his first bid on a three-bedroom house in Chelsea, Massachusetts, that was listed for $420,000. The property got six other offers and even bidding $30,000 over the asking price wasn’t enough to cinch the deal.

“It’s pretty strange,” he said. “I would have thought that it would have tipped more to my favor as a buyer.”

The inventory shortage is being felt in smaller cities, too. Kim Park, an agent with Keller Williams Realty in Boise, Idaho, said her business is down about 20% because sales have slowed. But bargains are still hard to find.

She’s working with a young family with two kids and a rental lease coming up for renewal next month. To buy a house for almost $300,000, they had to fight off three other bidders and pay $10,000 above asking price, Park said. They got it only because the winning bidder’s financing fell through.

Homeowners in Boise are staying put, worried about about letting potential buyers in during the pandemic or upgrading to a more expensive property when employment is so tenuous.

“It’s made our tight market that much tighter,” Park said.

In Los Angeles, Sally Forster Jones said two of her clients bid unsuccessfully this month on two different houses. One was listed for about $800,000 and the other for less than $1.5 million. Each received more than 30 offers and are now in escrow at above the listed price. Jones declined to share specifics on the homes because her clients made backup offers and she doesn’t want to invite more competition.

“I’m encouraging my sellers to put their property back on the market,” she said. “The fact that there’s limited inventory is to their advantage right now.”

Not all real estate agents see cutthroat competition. Nina Hatvany, a luxury agent with Compass in San Francisco, said buyers are coming back to the market but the complications of showing houses during a pandemic has weeded out all but the most motivated people. And, even then, there’s sometimes a mismatch between what people think a property is worth.

“I’ve got plenty of buyers saying, ‘I’m ready to buy if it’s a good price,’” she said. Meanwhile, “the sellers are worried about taking a big hit.”

Home prices will hold up, at least through the summer, but declines are coming, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. Once foreclosure moratoriums and forbearance programs end, lenders will start repossessions as unemployment persists. Ultimately, as many as 2 million homeowners will lose properties because of the the pandemic, he said.

In the near term, buyers are going to have to slug it out, especially for the types of property that are most in demand. Redfin’s data show that houses listed below $1 million were the most competitive, partly because banks have tightened standards for jumbo loans, said Marr. With everyone sheltering in place, buyers are also more eager to buy single-family houses than condos.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bidding-wars-back-even-housing-150005227.html

There’s a Rental Crisis Coming. Here’s How to Avoid It.

The Covid-19 pandemic is wreaking havoc on the U.S. rental market. Approximately 9 million households have so far failed to pay their May rent, according to industry data. Last month, 1.4 million fewer households paid their rent compared with this time last year.

The country’s 44 million rental households are uniquely vulnerable amid the current public health and economic crises. Renters often lack financial security and legal protections, not to mention bargaining power vis-a-vis their landlords. Worse, many are now being hit by the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Low-income renters, especially, work in industries crippled by Covid-related job loss: retail, hospitality and leisure, restaurants, and construction. Data suggests that 16.5 million renter households have already lost income because of the economic shutdown.

Faced with the specter of massive housing loss, policymakers have taken some steps to keep tenants in their homes, not only to help the renters but also as a critical public health measure — after all, it’s hard to comply with a “stay at home” order if you don’t have a home, or to socially distance if you’re forced to move into tight quarters with family or friends. The CARES Act has temporarily protected many renters by providing billions of dollars for emergency housing assistance, significantly expanded unemployment benefits and halted some evictions through July. Dozens of states and cities have also temporarily halted evictions, and citiessuch as Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia are providing emergency funding for tenants.

It appears these stopgaps are working, at least for now: We have not seen as severe a spike in nonpayment of rent as might otherwise be expected, and early rent payment figures from May look a bit more encouraging than April’s numbers.

But these remedies focus on the short term. Because of the scale of this downturn, many if not most unemployed renters will not have new jobs by the end of July. The federal government needs a long-term plan to prevent millions of unemployed renters from losing their homes when eviction moratoriums and unemployment sweeteners run out.

More shutdowns coming

Indeed, public health experts are predicting that the Covid-19 crisis will last well beyond the summer, and some government officials are bracing for waves of shutdowns that could continue for 12 to 18 months. It’s also likely that the U.S. will get hit with another, perhaps more deadly, wave of the virus next winter. When the economy does reopen, it will be in the throes of a deep recession during which millions of middle-income tenants will likely be unemployed and require housing assistance for the first time. Without smart, proactive policies to help millions of unemployed renters, we will be facing billions of dollars in rental debt, chaos at the eviction courts and overcrowded shelters primed for another outbreak.

Renters were struggling before the Covid-19 outbreak amid a well-documented affordable housing crunch. Nearly 40 percent of renter households are rent-burdened — meaning that they spend more than a third of their salary on rent — and two-thirds of renter households can’t afford an unexpected $400 expense.

On top of that, renters have few of the legal and financial protections offered to homeowners. Many states forbid renters from withholding rent even if their unit is in disrepair, most renters have no right to legal counsel during eviction proceedings, and once eviction judgments are handed down, renters can be evicted in a matter of days. And, partly as a result of the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, federal housing policy heavily favors homeowners over renters. Congress spends approximately three times as much on mortgage-interest reduction as it spends on rental housing vouchers each year. Whereas mortgage holders are protected by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, notably through creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, no analogue exists for renters.

For the moment, these renters are being kept afloat through a combination of short-term emergency cash, unemployment benefits and eviction bans. But it won’t last past the summer. On top of the one-time $1,200 stimulus check, the extra $600 per week added to unemployment insurance checks expires in July. Unemployment doesn’t cover everyone, notably our 10 million to 12 million taxpaying undocumented immigrants — many of whom are renters — and those working in the informal economy providing child care, cleaning and other services. Another 8 million to 12 million unemployed Americans haven’t even bothered to apply, due to a well-documented backlog of claims and the difficult application process.

It’s not clear what appetite Congress has for extending the current short-term stimulus measures. Lawmakers might choose to extend the $600 per week unemployment sweetener past July. An extra $2,400 per month is more than enough to cover rent for most Americans, and once unemployment offices dig out from the initial crush of claims, delivering this assistance would be an efficient and direct way to keep more people in their homes. Yet Republicans are concerned that these expanded benefits are discouraging people from returning to work, and any such proposal would have to survive tough negotiations.

Meanwhile, the $300 billion recently provided in the most recent stimulus package to keep small business workers on payroll is likely already gone. Temporary rental assistance remains underfunded by tens of billions of dollars, and need is only growing as layoffs continue.

Mom-and-pop landlords

While landlords should be encouraged to reduce payments or implement repayment plans, canceling rent isn’t a viable option for many of them. The prototypical rental unit might be inside a high-rise apartment building owned by a real estate giant, but in fact the overwhelming majority of rental properties in this country are single-unit homes owned by mom-and-pop landlords. These property owners rely on rent to pay their own mortgages, to finance repairs and upkeep of rental properties, and to pay property taxes.

So, protecting tens of millions of renters in the midst of a deep recession won’t be easy. But Congress needs to recognize the importance of keeping rent checks flowing. Delinquent rents could easily spiral into foreclosed units and a consolidation of rental stock similar to Wall Street buy-ups after the Great Recession. That means an increase in substandard housing, worse property management and more marginalized Americans. What’s more, evictions cost U.S. cities hundreds of million of dollars per year. That money should be helping to prop up a struggling economy instead.

But while difficult, it’s not impossible to prevent a rental-housing crisis. Congress needs to expand direct rental assistance. That means cash for rent, sent either directly to landlords or renters.

The National Low Income Housing Coalition estimates that $100 billion in rental assistance would support 15.5 million low-income households over the next year. The Urban Institute’s estimate is about twice that, and accounts for renters of all incomes. That line item’s a drop in the bucket compared to the total stimulus funding Congress anticipates pushing through this year, and will stabilize millions of Americans’ largest household expenditure.

Several mechanisms

There are several mechanisms Congress could chose for this. Cash could be directly provided for rent through the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s existing Emergency Solutions Grant network, in which local services providers administer funds to those at risk of homelessness, or through temporary expansion of the department’s Housing Choice Voucher program, through which local housing agencies pay landlords a portion of low-income tenants’ rent. While some housing agencies might face a flurry of new applications, most unemployed American renter households with zero income would easily qualify.

Alternatively, Congress could attempt to funnel money more directly to landlords. The benefit of this approach is that there are fewer landlords than tenants, and they’re easier to track down. The drawback is that this approach would involve creating an entirely new program. If Congress goes this route, it could model a program on the Treasury Department’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), focused on landlords’ non-owner occupied homes, or expand the Federal Reserve’s Main Street Lending program to allow lending to the rental industry.

The bottom line is that Congress needs to find a way to inject funding into the rental ecosystem — whether through unemployment insurance, rental assistance or direct payment to landlords. Protecting our renters won’t be cheap, and it won’t be easy. But ignoring the coming crisis will cost billions more down the line in the form of rental debt and landlord foreclosures, and could keep millions of Americans from safely sheltering in place. That’s something we truly can’t afford.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rental-crisis-coming-avoid-163959843.html